.. Copyright 2016 OpenMarket Ltd
..
.. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
.. you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
.. You may obtain a copy of the License at
..
..     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
..
.. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
.. distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
.. WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
.. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
.. limitations under the License.

Federation API
==============

Matrix homeservers use the Federation APIs (also known as server-server APIs)
to communicate with each other. Homeservers use these APIs to push messages to
each other in real-time, to request historic messages from each other, and to
query profile and presence information about users on each other's servers.

The APIs are implemented using HTTPS GETs and PUTs between each of the
servers. These HTTPS requests are strongly authenticated using public key
signatures at the TLS transport layer and using public key signatures in
HTTP Authorization headers at the HTTP layer.

There are three main kinds of communication that occur between homeservers:

Persisted Data Units (PDUs):
    These events are broadcast from one homeserver to any others that have
    joined the same room (identified by Room ID). They are persisted in
    long-term storage and record the history of messages and state for a
    room.

    Like email, it is the responsibility of the originating server of a PDU
    to deliver that event to its recipient servers. However PDUs are signed
    using the originating server's public key so that it is possible to
    deliver them through third-party servers.

Ephemeral Data Units (EDUs):
    These events are pushed between pairs of homeservers. They are not
    persisted and are not part of the history of a room, nor does the
    receiving homeserver have to reply to them.

Queries:
    These are single request/response interactions between a given pair of
    servers, initiated by one side sending an HTTPS GET request to obtain some
    information, and responded by the other. They are not persisted and contain
    no long-term significant history. They simply request a snapshot state at
    the instant the query is made.


EDUs and PDUs are further wrapped in an envelope called a Transaction, which is
transferred from the origin to the destination homeserver using an HTTPS PUT
request.

.. contents:: Table of Contents
.. sectnum::

Specification version
---------------------

This version of the specification is generated from
`matrix-doc <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc>`_ as of Git commit
`{{git_version}} <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/tree/{{git_rev}}>`_.

Server Discovery
----------------

Resolving Server Names
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Each matrix homeserver is identified by a server name consisting of a DNS name
and an optional TLS port.

.. code::

    server_name = dns_name [ ":" tls_port]
    dns_name = <host, see [RFC 3986], Section 3.2.2>
    tls_port = *DIGIT

.. **

If the port is present then the server is discovered by looking up an AAAA or
A record for the DNS name and connecting to the specified TLS port. If the port
is absent then the server is discovered by looking up a ``_matrix._tcp`` SRV
record for the DNS name. If this record does not exist then the server is
discovered by looking up an AAAA or A record on the DNS name and taking the
default fallback port number of 8448.
Homeservers may use SRV records to load balance requests between multiple TLS
endpoints or to failover to another endpoint if an endpoint fails.

Retrieving Server Keys
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Version 2
+++++++++

Each homeserver publishes its public keys under ``/_matrix/key/v2/server/``.
Homeservers query for keys by either getting ``/_matrix/key/v2/server/``
directly or by querying an intermediate notary server using a
``/_matrix/key/v2/query`` API. Intermediate notary servers query the
``/_matrix/key/v2/server/`` API on behalf of another server and sign the
response with their own key. A server may query multiple notary servers to
ensure that they all report the same public keys.

This approach is borrowed from the `Perspectives Project`_, but modified to
include the NACL keys and to use JSON instead of XML. It has the advantage of
avoiding a single trust-root since each server is free to pick which notary
servers they trust and can corroborate the keys returned by a given notary
server by querying other servers.

.. _Perspectives Project: http://perspectives-project.org/

Publishing Keys
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Homeservers publish the allowed TLS fingerprints and signing keys in a JSON
object at ``/_matrix/key/v2/server/{key_id}``. The response contains a list of
``verify_keys`` that are valid for signing federation requests made by the
server and for signing events. It contains a list of ``old_verify_keys``
which are only valid for signing events. Finally the response contains a list
of TLS certificate fingerprints to validate any connection made to the server.

A server may have multiple keys active at a given time. A server may have any
number of old keys. It is recommended that servers return a single JSON
response listing all of its keys whenever any ``key_id`` is requested to reduce
the number of round trips needed to discover the relevant keys for a server.
However a server may return a different responses for a different ``key_id``.

The ``tls_certificates`` contain a list of hashes of the X.509 TLS certificates
currently used by the server. The list must include SHA-256 hashes for every
certificate currently in use by the server. These fingerprints are valid until
the millisecond POSIX timestamp in ``valid_until_ts``.

The ``verify_keys`` can be used to sign requests and events made by the server
until the millisecond POSIX timestamp in ``valid_until_ts``. If a homeserver
receives an event with a ``origin_server_ts`` after the ``valid_until_ts`` then
it should request that ``key_id`` for the originating server to check whether
the key has expired.

The ``old_verify_keys`` can be used to sign events with an ``origin_server_ts``
before the ``expired_ts``. The ``expired_ts`` is a millisecond POSIX timestamp
of when the originating server stopped using that key.

Intermediate notary servers should cache a response for half of its remaining
life time to avoid serving a stale response. Originating servers should avoid
returning responses that expire in less than an hour to avoid repeated requests
for an about to expire certificate. Requesting servers should limit how
frequently they query for certificates to avoid flooding a server with requests.

If a server goes offline intermediate notary servers should continue to return
the last response they received from that server so that the signatures of old
events sent by that server can still be checked.

==================== =================== ======================================
    Key                    Type                         Description
==================== =================== ======================================
``server_name``      String              DNS name of the homeserver.
``verify_keys``      Object              Public keys of the homeserver for
                                         verifying digital signatures.
``old_verify_keys``  Object              The public keys that the server used
                                         to use and when it stopped using them.
``signatures``       Object              Digital signatures for this object
                                         signed using the ``verify_keys``.
``tls_fingerprints`` Array of Objects    Hashes of X.509 TLS certificates used
                                         by this this server encoded as base64.
``valid_until_ts``   Integer             POSIX timestamp when the list of valid
                                         keys should be refreshed.
==================== =================== ======================================


.. code:: json

    {
        "old_verify_keys": {
            "ed25519:auto1": {
                "expired_ts": 922834800000,
                "key": "Base+64+Encoded+Old+Verify+Key"
            }
        },
        "server_name": "example.org",
        "signatures": {
            "example.org": {
                "ed25519:auto2": "Base+64+Encoded+Signature"
            }
        },
        "tls_fingerprints": [
            {
                "sha256": "Base+64+Encoded+SHA-256-Fingerprint"
            }
        ],
        "valid_until_ts": 1052262000000,
        "verify_keys": {
            "ed25519:auto2": {
                "key": "Base+64+Encoded+Signature+Verification+Key"
            }
        }
    }

Querying Keys Through Another Server
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Servers may offer a query API ``_matrix/key/v2/query/`` for getting the keys
for another server. This API can be used to GET at list of JSON objects for a
given server or to POST a bulk query for a number of keys from a number of
servers. Either way the response is a list of JSON objects containing the
JSON published by the server under ``_matrix/key/v2/server/`` signed by
both the originating server and by this server.

The ``minimum_valid_until_ts`` is a millisecond POSIX timestamp indicating
when the returned certificate will need to be valid until to be useful to the
requesting server. This can be set using the maximum ``origin_server_ts`` of
an batch of events that a requesting server is trying to validate. This allows
an intermediate notary server to give a prompt cached response even if the
originating server is offline.

This API can return keys for servers that are offline be using cached responses
taken from when the server was online. Keys can be queried from multiple
servers to mitigate against DNS spoofing.

Requests:

.. code::

    GET /_matrix/key/v2/query/${server_name}/${key_id}/?minimum_valid_until_ts=${minimum_valid_until_ts} HTTP/1.1

    POST /_matrix/key/v2/query HTTP/1.1
    Content-Type: application/json

    {
        "server_keys": {
            "$server_name": {
                "$key_id": {
                    "minimum_valid_until_ts": $posix_timestamp
                }
            }
        }
    }


Response:

.. code::

    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Content-Type: application/json
    {
        "server_keys": [
           # List of responses with same format as /_matrix/key/v2/server
           # signed by both the originating server and this server.
        ]
    }

Version 1
+++++++++
.. WARNING::
  Version 1 of key distribution is obsolete


Homeservers publish their TLS certificates and signing keys in a JSON object
at ``/_matrix/key/v1``.

==================== =================== ======================================
    Key                    Type                         Description
==================== =================== ======================================
``server_name``      String              DNS name of the homeserver.
``verify_keys``      Object              Public keys of the homeserver for
                                         verifying digital signatures.
``signatures``       Object              Digital signatures for this object
                                         signed using the ``verify_keys``.
``tls_certificate``  String              The X.509 TLS certificate used by this
                                         this server encoded as base64.
==================== =================== ======================================

.. code:: json

    {
        "server_name": "example.org",
        "signatures": {
            "example.org": {
                "ed25519:auto": "Base+64+Encoded+Signature"
            }
        },
        "tls_certificate": "Base+64+Encoded+DER+Encoded+X509+TLS+Certificate"
        "verify_keys": {
            "ed25519:auto": "Base+64+Encoded+Signature+Verification+Key"
        }
    }

When fetching the keys for a server the client should check that the TLS
certificate in the JSON matches the TLS server certificate for the connection
and should check that the JSON signatures are correct for the supplied
``verify_keys``

Transactions
------------
.. WARNING::
  This section may be misleading or inaccurate.

The transfer of EDUs and PDUs between homeservers is performed by an exchange
of Transaction messages, which are encoded as JSON objects, passed over an HTTP
PUT request. A Transaction is meaningful only to the pair of homeservers that
exchanged it; they are not globally-meaningful.

Each transaction has:
 - An opaque transaction ID.
 - A timestamp (UNIX epoch time in milliseconds) generated by its origin
   server.
 - An origin and destination server name.
 - A list of "previous IDs".
 - A list of PDUs and EDUs - the actual message payload that the Transaction
   carries.

Transaction Fields
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

==================== =================== ======================================
    Key              Type                         Description
==================== =================== ======================================
``origin``           String              DNS name of homeserver making this
                                         transaction.
``origin_server_ts`` Integer             Timestamp in milliseconds on
                                         originating homeserver when this
                                         transaction started.
``previous_ids``     List of Strings     List of transactions that were sent
                                         immediately prior to this transaction.
``pdus``             List of Objects     List of persistent updates to rooms.
``edus``             List of Objects     List of ephemeral messages.
==================== =================== ======================================

.. code:: json

 {
  "transaction_id":"916d630ea616342b42e98a3be0b74113",
  "ts":1404835423000,
  "origin":"red",
  "prev_ids":["e1da392e61898be4d2009b9fecce5325"],
  "pdus":[...],
  "edus":[...]
 }

The ``prev_ids`` field contains a list of previous transaction IDs that the
``origin`` server has sent to this ``destination``. Its purpose is to act as a
sequence checking mechanism - the destination server can check whether it has
successfully received that Transaction, or ask for a re-transmission if not.

The ``pdus`` field of a transaction is a list, containing zero or more PDUs.[*]
Each PDU is itself a JSON object containing a number of keys, the exact details
of which will vary depending on the type of PDU. Similarly, the ``edus`` field
is another list containing the EDUs. This key may be entirely absent if there
are no EDUs to transfer.

(* Normally the PDU list will be non-empty, but the server should cope with
receiving an "empty" transaction, as this is useful for informing peers of other
transaction IDs they should be aware of. This effectively acts as a push
mechanism to encourage peers to continue to replicate content.)

PDUs
----

All PDUs have:

- An ID to identify the PDU itself
- A room ID that it relates to
- A declaration of their type
- A list of other PDU IDs that have been seen recently in that room (regardless
  of which origin sent them)


Required PDU Fields
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

==================== ================== =======================================
 Key                  Type               Description
==================== ================== =======================================
``context``          String             Room identifier
``user_id``          String             The ID of the user sending the PDU
``origin``           String             DNS name of homeserver that created
                                        this PDU
``pdu_id``           String             Unique identifier for PDU on the
                                        originating homeserver
``origin_server_ts`` Integer            Timestamp in milliseconds on origin
                                        homeserver when this PDU was created.
``pdu_type``         String             PDU event type
``content``          Object             The content of the PDU.
``prev_pdus``        List of (String,   The originating homeserver, PDU ids and
                     String, Object)    hashes of the most recent PDUs the
                     Triplets           homeserver was aware of for the room
                                        when it made this PDU
``depth``            Integer            The maximum depth of the previous PDUs
                                        plus one
``is_state``         Boolean            True if this PDU is updating room state
==================== ================== =======================================

.. code:: json

 {
  "context":"#example:green.example.com",
  "origin":"green.example.com",
  "pdu_id":"a4ecee13e2accdadf56c1025af232176",
  "origin_server_ts":1404838188000,
  "pdu_type":"m.room.message",
  "prev_pdus":[
    ["blue.example.com","99d16afbc8",
        {"sha256":"abase64encodedsha256hashshouldbe43byteslong"}]
  ],
  "hashes":{"sha256":"thishashcoversallfieldsincasethisisredacted"},
  "signatures":{
    "green.example.com":{
      "ed25519:key_version:":"these86bytesofbase64signaturecoveressentialfieldsincludinghashessocancheckredactedpdus"
    }
  },
  "is_state":false,
  "content": {...}
 }

In contrast to Transactions, it is important to note that the ``prev_pdus``
field of a PDU refers to PDUs that any origin server has sent, rather than
previous IDs that this ``origin`` has sent. This list may refer to other PDUs
sent by the same origin as the current one, or other origins.

Because of the distributed nature of participants in a Matrix conversation, it
is impossible to establish a globally-consistent total ordering on the events.
However, by annotating each outbound PDU at its origin with IDs of other PDUs
it has received, a partial ordering can be constructed allowing causality
relationships to be preserved. A client can then display these messages to the
end-user in some order consistent with their content and ensure that no message
that is semantically in reply of an earlier one is ever displayed before it.

State Update PDU Fields
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PDUs fall into two main categories: those that deliver Events, and those that
synchronise State. For PDUs that relate to State synchronisation, additional
keys exist to support this:

======================== ============ =========================================
 Key                      Type         Description
======================== ============ =========================================
``state_key``            String       Combined with the ``pdu_type`` this
                                      identifies the which part of the room
                                      state is updated
``required_power_level`` Integer      The required power level needed to
                                      replace this update.
``prev_state_id``        String       The homeserver of the update this
                                      replaces
``prev_state_origin``    String       The PDU id of the update this replaces.
``user_id``              String       The user updating the state.
======================== ============ =========================================

.. code:: json

 {...,
  "is_state":true,
  "state_key":TODO-doc
  "required_power_level":TODO-doc
  "prev_state_id":TODO-doc
  "prev_state_origin":TODO-doc
 }


EDUs
----

EDUs, by comparison to PDUs, do not have an ID, a room ID, or a list of
"previous" IDs. The only mandatory fields for these are the type, origin and
destination homeserver names, and the actual nested content.

======================== ============ =========================================
 Key                      Type          Description
======================== ============ =========================================
``edu_type``             String       The type of the ephemeral message.
``content``              Object       Content of the ephemeral message.
======================== ============ =========================================

.. code:: json

 {
  "edu_type":"m.presence",
  "origin":"blue",
  "destination":"orange",
  "content":{...}
 }


Protocol URLs
-------------

.. WARNING::
  This section may be misleading or inaccurate.

All these URLs are name-spaced within a prefix of::

  /_matrix/federation/v1/...

For active pushing of messages representing live activity "as it happens"::

  PUT .../send/<transaction_id>/
    Body: JSON encoding of a single Transaction
    Response: TODO-doc

The transaction_id path argument will override any ID given in the JSON body.
The destination name will be set to that of the receiving server itself. Each
embedded PDU in the transaction body will be processed.


To fetch all the state of a given room::

  GET .../state/<room_id>/
    Response: JSON encoding of a single Transaction containing multiple PDUs

Retrieves a snapshot of the entire current state of the given room. The
response will contain a single Transaction, inside which will be a list of PDUs
that encode the state.


To fetch a particular event::

  GET .../event/<event_id>/
    Response: JSON encoding of a partial Transaction containing the event

Retrieves a single event. The response will contain a partial Transaction,
having just the ``origin``, ``origin_server_ts`` and ``pdus`` fields; the
event will be encoded as the only PDU in the ``pdus`` list.


To backfill events on a given room::

  GET .../backfill/<room_id>/
    Query args: v, limit
    Response: JSON encoding of a single Transaction containing multiple PDUs

Retrieves a sliding-window history of previous PDUs that occurred on the given
room. Starting from the PDU ID(s) given in the "v" argument, the PDUs that
preceded it are retrieved, up to a total number given by the "limit" argument.


To stream events all the events::

  GET .../pull/
    Query args: origin, v
    Response: JSON encoding of a single Transaction consisting of multiple PDUs

Retrieves all of the transactions later than any version given by the "v"
arguments.


To make a query::

  GET .../query/<query_type>
    Query args: as specified by the individual query types
    Response: JSON encoding of a response object

Performs a single query request on the receiving homeserver. The Query Type
part of the path specifies the kind of query being made, and its query
arguments have a meaning specific to that kind of query. The response is a
JSON-encoded object whose meaning also depends on the kind of query.


To join a room::

  GET .../make_join/<room_id>/<user_id>
    Response: JSON encoding of a join proto-event

  PUT .../send_join/<room_id>/<event_id>
    Response: JSON encoding of the state of the room at the time of the event

Performs the room join handshake. For more information, see "Joining Rooms"
below.

Joining Rooms
-------------

When a new user wishes to join room that the user's homeserver already knows
about, the homeserver can immediately determine if this is allowable by
inspecting the state of the room, and if it is acceptable, it can generate,
sign, and emit a new ``m.room.member`` state event adding the user into that
room. When the homeserver does not yet know about the room it cannot do this
directly. Instead, it must take a longer multi-stage handshaking process by
which it first selects a remote homeserver which is already participating in
that room, and uses it to assist in the joining process. This is the remote
join handshake.

This handshake involves the homeserver of the new member wishing to join
(referred to here as the "joining" server), the directory server hosting the
room alias the user is requesting to join with, and a homeserver where existing
room members are already present (referred to as the "resident" server).

In summary, the remote join handshake consists of the joining server querying
the directory server for information about the room alias; receiving a room ID
and a list of join candidates. The joining server then requests information
about the room from one of the residents. It uses this information to construct
a ``m.room.member`` event which it finally sends to a resident server.

Conceptually these are three different roles of homeserver. In practice the
directory server is likely to be resident in the room, and so may be selected
by the joining server to be the assisting resident. Likewise, it is likely that
the joining server picks the same candidate resident for both phases of event
construction, though in principle any valid candidate may be used at each time.
Thus, any join handshake can potentially involve anywhere from two to four
homeservers, though most in practice will use just two.

::

  Client         Joining                Directory       Resident
                 Server                 Server          Server

  join request -->
                 |
                 directory request ------->
                 <---------- directory response
                 |
                 make_join request ----------------------->
                 <------------------------------- make_join response
                 |
                 send_join request ----------------------->
                 <------------------------------- send_join response
                 |
  <---------- join response

The first part of the handshake usually involves using the directory server to
request the room ID and join candidates. This is covered in more detail on the
directory server documentation, below. In the case of a new user joining a
room as a result of a received invite, the joining user's homeserver could
optimise this step away by picking the origin server of that invite message as
the join candidate. However, the joining server should be aware that the origin
server of the invite might since have left the room, so should be prepared to
fall back on the regular join flow if this optimisation fails.

Once the joining server has the room ID and the join candidates, it then needs
to obtain enough information about the room to fill in the required fields of
the ``m.room.member`` event. It obtains this by selecting a resident from the
candidate list, and requesting the ``make_join`` endpoint using a ``GET``
request, specifying the room ID and the user ID of the new member who is
attempting to join.

The resident server replies to this request with a JSON-encoded object having a
single key called ``event``; within this is an object whose fields contain some
of the information that the joining server will need. Despite its name, this
object is not a full event; notably it does not need to be hashed or signed by
the resident homeserver. The required fields are:

==================== ======== ============
 Key                  Type     Description
==================== ======== ============
``type``             String   The value ``m.room.member``
``auth_events``      List     An event-reference list containing the
                              authorization events that would allow this member
                              to join
``content``          Object   The event content
``depth``            Integer  (this field must be present but is ignored; it
                              may be 0)
``origin``           String   The name of the resident homeserver
``origin_server_ts`` Integer  A timestamp added by the resident homeserver
``prev_events``      List     An event-reference list containing the immediate
                              predecessor events
``room_id``          String   The room ID of the room
``sender``           String   The user ID of the joining member
``state_key``        String   The user ID of the joining member
==================== ======== ============

The ``content`` field itself must be an object, containing:

============== ====== ============
 Key            Type   Description
============== ====== ============
``membership`` String The value ``join``
============== ====== ============

The joining server now has sufficient information to construct the real join
event from these protoevent fields. It copies the values of most of them,
adding (or replacing) the following fields:

==================== ======= ============
 Key                  Type    Description
==================== ======= ============
``event_id``         String  A new event ID specified by the joining homeserver
``origin``           String  The name of the joining homeserver
``origin_server_ts`` Integer A timestamp added by the joining homeserver
==================== ======= ============

This will be a true event, so the joining server should apply the event-signing
algorithm to it, resulting in the addition of the ``hashes`` and ``signatures``
fields.

To complete the join handshake, the joining server must now submit this new
event to an resident homeserver, by using the ``send_join`` endpoint. This is
invoked using the room ID and the event ID of the new member event.

The resident homeserver then accepts this event into the room's event graph,
and responds to the joining server with the full set of state for the newly-
joined room. This is returned as a two-element list, whose first element is the
integer 200, and whose second element is an object which contains the
following keys:

============== ===== ============
 Key            Type  Description
============== ===== ============
``auth_chain`` List  A list of events giving the authorization chain for this
                     join event
``state``      List  A complete list of the prevailing state events at the
                     instant just before accepting the new ``m.room.member``
                     event
============== ===== ============

.. TODO-spec
  - (paul) I don't really understand why the full auth_chain events are given
    here. What purpose does it serve expanding them out in full, when surely
    they'll appear in the state anyway?

Backfilling
-----------

Once a homeserver has joined a room, it receives all the events emitted by
other homeservers in that room, and is thus aware of the entire history of the
room from that moment onwards. Since users in that room are able to request the
history by the ``/messages`` client API endpoint, it's possible that they might
step backwards far enough into history before the homeserver itself was a
member of that room.

To cover this case, the federation API provides a server-to-server analog of
the ``/messages`` client API, allowing one homeserver to fetch history from
another. This is the ``/backfill`` API.

To request more history, the requesting homeserver picks another homeserver
that it thinks may have more (most likely this should be a homeserver for some
of the existing users in the room at the earliest point in history it has
currently), and makes a ``/backfill`` request. The parameters of this request
give an event ID that the requesting homeserver wishes to obtain, and a number
specifying how many more events of history before that one to return at most.

The response to this request is an object with the following keys:

==================== ======== ============
 Key                  Type     Description
==================== ======== ============
``pdus``             List     A list of events
``origin``           String   The name of the resident homeserver
``origin_server_ts`` Integer  A timestamp added by the resident homeserver
==================== ======== ============

The list of events given in ``pdus`` is returned in reverse chronological
order; having the most recent event first (i.e. the event whose event ID is
that requested by the requestor in the ``v`` parameter).

.. TODO-spec
  Specify (or remark that it is unspecified) how the server handles divergent
  history. DFS? BFS? Anything weirder?


Authentication
--------------

Request Authentication
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Every HTTP request made by a homeserver is authenticated using public key
digital signatures. The request method, target and body are signed by wrapping
them in a JSON object and signing it using the JSON signing algorithm. The
resulting signatures are added as an Authorization header with an auth scheme
of X-Matrix. Note that the target field should include the full path starting with
``/_matrix/...``, including the ``?`` and any query parameters if present, but
should not include the leading ``https:``, nor the destination server's
hostname.

Step 1 sign JSON:

.. code::

    {
        "method": "GET",
        "uri": "/target",
        "origin": "origin.hs.example.com",
        "destintation": "destination.hs.example.com",
        "content": { JSON content ... },
        "signatures": {
            "origin.hs.example.com": {
                "ed25519:key1": "ABCDEF..."
            }
        }
   }

Step 2 add Authorization header:

.. code::

    GET /target HTTP/1.1
    Authorization: X-Matrix origin=origin.example.com,key="ed25519:key1",sig="ABCDEF..."
    Content-Type: application/json

    { JSON content ... }


Example python code:

.. code:: python

    def authorization_headers(origin_name, origin_signing_key,
                              destination_name, request_method, request_target,
                              content_json=None):
        request_json = {
             "method": request_method,
             "uri": request_target,
             "origin": origin_name,
             "destination": destination_name,
        }

        if content_json is not None:
            request["content"] = content_json

        signed_json = sign_json(request_json, origin_name, origin_signing_key)

        authorization_headers = []

        for key, sig in signed_json["signatures"][origin_name].items():
            authorization_headers.append(bytes(
                "X-Matrix origin=%s,key=\"%s\",sig=\"%s\"" % (
                    origin_name, key, sig,
                )
            ))

        return ("Authorization", authorization_headers)

Response Authentication
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Responses are authenticated by the TLS server certificate. A homeserver should
not send a request until it has authenticated the connected server to avoid
leaking messages to eavesdroppers.

Client TLS Certificates
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Requests are authenticated at the HTTP layer rather than at the TLS layer
because HTTP services like Matrix are often deployed behind load balancers that
handle the TLS and these load balancers make it difficult to check TLS client
certificates.

A homeserver may provide a TLS client certificate and the receiving homeserver
may check that the client certificate matches the certificate of the origin
homeserver.

Server-Server Authorization
---------------------------

.. TODO-doc
  - PDU signing (see the Event signing section earlier)
  - State conflict resolution (see below)

State Conflict Resolution
-------------------------
.. NOTE::
  This section is a work in progress.

.. TODO-doc
  - How do conflicts arise (diagrams?)
  - How are they resolved (incl tie breaks)
  - How does this work with deleting current state
  - How do we reject invalid federation traffic?

  [[TODO(paul): At this point we should probably have a long description of how
  State management works, with descriptions of clobbering rules, power levels, etc
  etc... But some of that detail is rather up-in-the-air, on the whiteboard, and
  so on. This part needs refining. And writing in its own document as the details
  relate to the server/system as a whole, not specifically to server-server
  federation.]]

Presence
--------
The server API for presence is based entirely on exchange of the following
EDUs. There are no PDUs or Federation Queries involved.

Performing a presence update and poll subscription request::

  EDU type: m.presence

  Content keys:
    push: (optional): list of push operations.
      Each should be an object with the following keys:
        user_id: string containing a User ID
        presence: "offline"|"unavailable"|"online"|"free_for_chat"
        status_msg: (optional) string of free-form text
        last_active_ago: milliseconds since the last activity by the user

    poll: (optional): list of strings giving User IDs

    unpoll: (optional): list of strings giving User IDs

The presence of this combined message is two-fold: it informs the recipient
server of the current status of one or more users on the sending server (by the
``push`` key), and it maintains the list of users on the recipient server that
the sending server is interested in receiving updates for, by adding (by the
``poll`` key) or removing them (by the ``unpoll`` key). The ``poll`` and
``unpoll`` lists apply *changes* to the implied list of users; any existing IDs
that the server sent as ``poll`` operations in a previous message are not
removed until explicitly requested by a later ``unpoll``.

On receipt of a message containing a non-empty ``poll`` list, the receiving
server should immediately send the sending server a presence update EDU of its
own, containing in a ``push`` list the current state of every user that was in
the original EDU's ``poll`` list.

Sending a presence invite::

  EDU type: m.presence_invite

  Content keys:
    observed_user: string giving the User ID of the user whose presence is
      requested (i.e. the recipient of the invite)
    observer_user: string giving the User ID of the user who is requesting to
      observe the presence (i.e. the sender of the invite)

Accepting a presence invite::

  EDU type: m.presence_accept

  Content keys - as for m.presence_invite

Rejecting a presence invite::

  EDU type: m.presence_deny

  Content keys - as for m.presence_invite

.. TODO-doc
  - Explain the timing-based round-trip reduction mechanism for presence
    messages
  - Explain the zero-byte presence inference logic
  See also: docs/client-server/model/presence

Profiles
--------

The server API for profiles is based entirely on the following Federation
Queries. There are no additional EDU or PDU types involved, other than the
implicit ``m.presence`` and ``m.room.member`` events (see section below).

Querying profile information::

  Query type: profile

  Arguments:
    user_id: the ID of the user whose profile to return
    field: (optional) string giving a field name

  Returns: JSON object containing the following keys:
    displayname: string of free-form text
    avatar_url: string containing an HTTP-scheme URL

If the query contains the optional ``field`` key, it should give the name of a
result field. If such is present, then the result should contain only a field
of that name, with no others present. If not, the result should contain as much
of the user's profile as the homeserver has available and can make public.

Directory
---------

The server API for directory queries is also based on Federation Queries.

Querying directory information::

  Query type: directory

  Arguments:
    room_alias: the room alias to query

  Returns: JSON object containing the following keys:
    room_id: string giving the underlying room ID the alias maps to
    servers: list of strings giving the join candidates

The list of join candidates is a list of server names that are likely to hold
the given room; these are servers that the requesting server may wish to use as
resident servers as part of the remote join handshake. This list may or may not
include the server answering the query.

Send-to-device messaging
------------------------

.. TODO: add modules to the federation spec and make this a module

The server API for send-to-device messaging is based on the following
EDU. There are no PDUs or Federation Queries involved.

Each send-to-device message should be sent to the destination server using
the following EDU::

  EDU type: m.direct_to_device

  Content keys:
    sender: user ID of the sender

    type: event type for the message

    message_id: unique id for the message: used for idempotence

    messages: The messages to send. A map from user ID, to a map from device ID
        to message body. The device ID may also be *, meaning all known devices
        for the user.
