Filip/matrix-spec
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec synced 2026-02-27 08:23:42 +01:00
Code Issues Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Formatting tweaks

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Richard van der Hoff 2021-01-27 12:33:16 +00:00
parent 1d90cacf6e
commit 277ff682d6
1 changed files with 32 additions and 20 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

52
proposals/2858-Multiple-SSO-Identity-Providers.md
View file

@ -1,25 +1,30 @@
# MSC2858: Multiple SSO Identity Providers # MSC2858: Multiple SSO Identity Providers
Matrix already has generic SSO support, but it does not yield the best user experience especially for Matrix already has generic SSO support, but it does not yield the best user experience especially for
instances which wish to offer multiple identity providers. This MSC provides a simple and fully instances which wish to offer multiple identity providers (IdPs). This MSC provides a simple and fully
backwards compatible way to extend the current spec which would allow clients to give users options backwards compatible way to extend the current spec which would allow clients to give users options
like `Continue with Google` and `Continue with Github` side-by-side. like `Continue with Google` and `Continue with Github` side-by-side.
## Proposal
Currently, Matrix supports `m.login.sso`, `m.login.token` and `/login/sso/redirect` for clients to Currently, Matrix supports `m.login.sso`, `m.login.token` and `/login/sso/redirect` for clients to
pass their user to the configured Identity provider and for them to come back with something which pass their user to the configured Identity provider and for them to come back with something which
is exchangeable for a Matrix access token. This flow offers no insight to the user as to what is exchangeable for a Matrix access token. This flow offers no insight to the user as to what
Identity providers are available. It allows clients to offer a super generic `Sign in with SSO` Identity providers are available: clients can offer only a very generic `Sign in with SSO`
button only. With the currently possible solutions and workarounds the experience is far from great button. With the currently possible solutions and workarounds the experience is far from great
and user's have to blindly click `Sign in with SSO` without any clue as to what's hiding on the other and user's have to blindly click `Sign in with SSO` without any clue as to what's hiding on the other
side of the door. Some users will definitely not be familiar with `SSO` but will be with the concept of side of the door. Some users will definitely not be familiar with `SSO` but will be with the concept of
"Continue with Google" or similar. "Continue with Google" or similar.
By augmenting the `m.login.sso` flow discovery definition to include metadata on the supported IDPs ## Proposal
the client can show a button for each of the supported providers, yielding a much more usable
experience. This would look like this: We extend the [login
flow](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.6.1#login) to allow clients
to choose an SSO Identity provider before control is handed over to the server.
### Extensions to login flow discovery
The response to [`GET /_matrix/client/r0/login`](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.6.1#get-matrix-client-r0-login)
is extended to **optionally** include an `identity_providers` property for
flows whose type `m.login.sso`. This would look like this:
```json ```json
{ {
@ -46,16 +51,22 @@ experience. This would look like this:
} }
``` ```
The `id` field is a string using the common identifier grammar as defined in The value of the `identity_providers` property is a list, each entry consisting
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2758. of an object with the following fields:
The `name` field should be the human readable string intended for printing by the client. * The `id` field is **required**. It should be a string using the common
identifier grammar as defined in
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2758.
The `icon` field is the only optional field and should point to an icon representing the IdP. * The `name` field is **required**. It should be the human readable string
If present then it must be an MXC URI to an image resource. intended for printing by the client.
* The `icon` field is **optional**. It should point to an icon representing
the IdP. If present then it must be an MXC URI to an image resource.
A new endpoint would be needed to support redirecting directly to one of the IDPs: ### Extend the `/login/sso/redirect` endpoint
A new endpoint is added to support redirecting directly to one of the IdPs:
`GET /_matrix/client/r0/login/sso/redirect/{idp_id}` `GET /_matrix/client/r0/login/sso/redirect/{idp_id}`
@ -63,14 +74,15 @@ This would behave identically to the existing endpoint without the last argument
except would allow the server to forward the user directly to the correct IdP. except would allow the server to forward the user directly to the correct IdP.
For the case of backwards compatibility the existing endpoint is to remain, For the case of backwards compatibility the existing endpoint is to remain,
and if the server supports multiple SSO IDPs it should offer the user a page and if the server supports multiple SSO IdPs it should offer the user a page
which lets them choose between the available IdP options as a fallback. which lets them choose between the available IdP options as a fallback.
For the case of User Interactive Auth the server would just give the standard ### Notes on user-interactive auth
SSO flow option without any identity_providers as there is no method for
a client to choose an idp within that flow at this time nor is it as
essential.
For the case of User Interactive Auth the server would just give the standard
SSO flow option without any `identity_providers` as there is no method for
a client to choose an IdP within that flow at this time nor is it as
essential.
## Potential issues ## Potential issues