mirror of
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec
synced 2026-03-23 19:44:09 +01:00
Outright remove threads references
Apparently this breaks the table of contents
This commit is contained in:
parent
9e7929c43e
commit
29c946517a
|
|
@ -1877,10 +1877,6 @@ forming a sort of chain of events.
|
|||
This specification describes the following relationship types:
|
||||
|
||||
* [Rich replies](#rich-replies)
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
TODO: TR,MSC3440: Uncomment for threading support.
|
||||
* [Event threading](#threading)
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
{{% boxes/note %}}
|
||||
This specification does not currently define any relation type which requires
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -51,14 +51,6 @@ An example reply would be:
|
|||
Note that the `event_id` of the `m.in_reply_to` object has the same requirements
|
||||
as if it were to be under `m.relates_to` directly instead.
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
TODO: TR, MSC3440: Uncomment for threads support
|
||||
{{% boxes/note %}}
|
||||
Some event relationships, like [threads](#threading), describe what it looks like
|
||||
to both form a relationship *and* still reply to another event.
|
||||
{{% /boxes/note %}}
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
#### Fallbacks for rich replies
|
||||
|
||||
Some clients may not have support for rich replies and therefore need a
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue