Filip/matrix-spec
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec synced 2026-02-20 04:53:42 +01:00
Code Issues Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Expand description of validation and verification

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Johannes Marbach 2025-05-26 11:05:36 +02:00
parent c1894e09f0
commit 3f3c0ca0ba
1 changed files with 56 additions and 18 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

74
content/client-server-api/modules/end_to_end_encryption.md
View file

@ -1517,25 +1517,63 @@ The plaintext payload is of the form:
The type and content of the plaintext message event are given in the The type and content of the plaintext message event are given in the
payload. payload.
Other properties are included in order to prevent an attacker from ###### Validation of incoming decrypted events
publishing someone else's curve25519 keys as their own and subsequently
claiming to have sent messages which they didn't. `sender` must
correspond to the user who sent the event, `recipient` to the local
user, and `recipient_keys` to the local ed25519 key.
Clients must ensure that the sending device owns the private part of After decrypting an incoming encrypted event, clients MUST apply the
the ed25519 key it claims to have in the Olm payload. This is crucial following checks:
when the ed25519 key corresponds to a verified device. To perform
this check, clients MUST confirm that the `sender_key` property in the 1. The `sender` property in the decrypted content must match the
cleartext `m.room.encrypted` event body, and the `keys.ed25519` property `sender` of the event.
in the decrypted plaintext, match the keys under the `sender_device_keys` 2. The `keys.ed25519` property in the decrypted content must match
property. Additionally, clients MUST also verify the signature of the keys. the `sender_key` property in the cleartext `m.room.encrypted`
If `sender_device_keys` is absent, clients MUST retrieve the sender's event body.
keys from [`/keys/query`](#post_matrixclientv3keysquery) instead. This 3. The `recipient` property in the decrypted content must match
will not allow them to verify key ownership if the sending device was the user ID of the local user.
logged out or had its keys reset since sending the event. Therefore, 4. The `recipient_keys.ed25519` property in the decrypted content
clients MUST populate the `sender_device_keys` property when sending must match the client device's [Ed25519 signing key](#device-keys).
events themselves. 5. Where `sender_device_keys` is present in the decrypted content:
1. `sender_device_keys.user_id` must also match the `sender`
of the event.
2. `sender_device_keys.keys.ed25519:<device_id>` must also match
the `sender_key` property in the cleartext `m.room.encrypted`
event body.
3. `sender_device_keys.keys.curve25519:<device_id>` must match
the Curve25519 key used to establish the Olm session.
4. The `sender_device_keys` structure must have a valid signature
from the key with ID `ed25519:<device_id>` (i.e., the sending
device's Ed25519 key).
Any event that does not comply with these checks MUST be discarded.
###### Verification of the sending user for incoming events
In addition, for each Olm session, clients MUST verify that the
Curve25519 key used to establish the Olm session does indeed belong
to the claimed `sender`. This requires a signed "device keys" structure
for that Curve25519 key, which can be obtained in one of two ways:
1. An Olm message may be received with a `sender_device_keys` property
in the decrypted content.
2. The keys are returned via a [`/keys/query`](#post_matrixclientv3keysquery)
request. Note that both the Curve25519 key **and** the Ed25519 key in
the returned device keys structure must match those used in an
Olm-encrypted event as above. (In particular, the Ed25519 key must
be present in the **encrypted** content of an Olm-encrypted event
to prevent an attacker from claiming another user's Curve25519 key
as their own.)
Ownership of the Curve25519 key is then established in one of two ways:
1. Via [cross-signing](#cross-signing). For this to be sufficient, the
device keys structure must be signed by the sender's self-signing key,
and that self-signing key must itself have been validated (either via
[explicit verification](#device-verification) or a TOFU mechanism).
2. Via explicit verification of the device's Ed25519 signing key, as
contained in the device keys structure. This is no longer recommended.
A failure to complete these verifications does not necessarily mean that
the session is bogus; however it is the case that there is no proof that
the claimed sender is accurate, and the user should be warned accordingly.
If a client has multiple sessions established with another device, it If a client has multiple sessions established with another device, it
should use the session from which it last received and successfully should use the session from which it last received and successfully