Filip/matrix-spec
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec synced 2025-12-20 16:38:37 +01:00
Code Issues Actions 3 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix typo (#2171)
Some checks failed
Spec / 🔎 Validate OpenAPI specifications (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Spec / 🔎 Check Event schema examples (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Spec / 🔎 Check OpenAPI definitions examples (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Spec / 🔎 Check JSON Schemas inline examples (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Spec / ⚙️ Calculate baseURL for later jobs (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Spec / 📢 Run towncrier for changelog (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Spell Check / Spell Check with Typos (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Spec / 🐍 Build OpenAPI definitions (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Spec / 📖 Build the spec (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Spec / 🔎 Validate generated HTML (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Spec / 📖 Build the historical backup spec (push) Has been cancelled
Details

Browse source 
Signed-off-by: Johannes Marbach <n0-0ne+github@mailbox.org>
This commit is contained in:
Johannes Marbach 2025-07-02 12:20:48 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent 6edb6ba1cd
commit 484a777572
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
2 changed files with 2 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
changelogs/client_server/newsfragments/2171.clarification Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1 @@
Fix various typos throughout the specification.

2
content/client-server-api/modules/event_replacements.md
View file

@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ property under `m.new_content`.
A particular constraint applies to events which replace a [reply](#rich-replies): A particular constraint applies to events which replace a [reply](#rich-replies):
in contrast to the original reply, there should be no `m.in_reply_to` property in contrast to the original reply, there should be no `m.in_reply_to` property
in the the `m.relates_to` object, since it would be redundant (see in the `m.relates_to` object, since it would be redundant (see
[Applying `m.new_content`](#applying-mnew_content) above, which notes that the [Applying `m.new_content`](#applying-mnew_content) above, which notes that the
original event's `m.relates_to` is preserved), as well as being contrary to the original event's `m.relates_to` is preserved), as well as being contrary to the
spirit of the event relationships mechanism which expects only one "parent" per spirit of the event relationships mechanism which expects only one "parent" per