mirror of
https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec
synced 2026-04-14 23:24:09 +02:00
Fix typos
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6b3ae471ae
commit
634717c2f4
|
|
@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ paths:
|
|||
based on a preset.
|
||||
|
||||
If unspecified, the server should use the `visibility` to determine
|
||||
which preset to use. A visbility of `public` equates to a preset of
|
||||
which preset to use. A visibility of `public` equates to a preset of
|
||||
`public_chat` and `private` visibility equates to a preset of
|
||||
`private_chat`.
|
||||
is_direct:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ paths:
|
|||
|
||||
In v1.7 of the specification, transmission of the generated token to an unauthenticated client is
|
||||
left as an implementation detail. Future MSCs such as [MSC3906](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3906)
|
||||
might standarise a way to transmit the token between clients.
|
||||
might standardise a way to transmit the token between clients.
|
||||
|
||||
The generated token MUST only be valid for a single login, enforced by the server. Clients which
|
||||
intend to log in multiple devices must generate a token for each.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ paths:
|
|||
exception of the response format being fixed.
|
||||
|
||||
This endpoint is preferred over the v1 API as it provides
|
||||
a more standarised response format. Senders which receive
|
||||
a more standardised response format. Senders which receive
|
||||
a 400, 404, or other status code which indicates this endpoint
|
||||
is not available should retry using the v1 API instead.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ paths:
|
|||
exception of the response format being fixed.
|
||||
|
||||
This endpoint is preferred over the v1 API as it provides
|
||||
a more standarised response format. Senders which receive
|
||||
a more standardised response format. Senders which receive
|
||||
a 400, 404, or other status code which indicates this endpoint
|
||||
is not available should retry using the v1 API instead.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -191,4 +191,4 @@ Describing grammar
|
|||
|
||||
Use `RFC5234-style ABNF <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5234>`_ when describing
|
||||
the grammar for something in the spec, such as user IDs or server names. Use lowercase
|
||||
and underscore-deliminated element names (`user_id`, not `UserID` or `user-id`).
|
||||
and underscore-delimited element names (`user_id`, not `UserID` or `user-id`).
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ day until the release has actually happened & blog post published.
|
|||
|
||||
Once a release is scheduled, the SCT will begin planning what the next release is
|
||||
expected to look like. The plan should be included in the spec release blog post,
|
||||
and be ready for exeuction on spec release day. Plans are guides and not promises.
|
||||
and be ready for execution on spec release day. Plans are guides and not promises.
|
||||
|
||||
A blog post for the SCT members to review should be ready at minimum 1 week before
|
||||
the target release date. 1-2 days before the release itself, the prerequisite steps
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue