Add OAuth 2.0 authorization code and refresh token grant types

As per MSC2964

Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
This commit is contained in:
Kévin Commaille 2025-05-25 13:17:41 +02:00
parent 687e8c3c22
commit 9b98031868
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: F26F4BE20A08255B

View file

@ -1481,6 +1481,244 @@ MAY reject weak passwords with an error code `M_WEAK_PASSWORD`.
### OAuth 2.0 API
#### Grant types
OAuth 2.0 defines several ways in [RFC 6749](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749)
and other RFCs to obtain an access token at the token endpoint, these are called
grants.
All these grants require the client to know the following authorization server
metadata:
- `token_endpoint`
- `grant_types_supported`
The client must also have obtained a `client_id` by registering with the server.
This specification supports the following grant types:
- [Authorization code grant](#authorization-code-grant)
- [Refresh token grant](#refresh-token-grant)
{{% boxes/note %}}
Other MSCs might add support for more grant types in the future, like [MSC4108](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/4108)
which makes use of the device code grant.
{{% /boxes/note %}}
##### Authorization code grant
As per [RFC 6749 section 4.1](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-4.1),
the authorization code grant lets the client obtain an access token through a
browser redirect.
This grant requires the client to know the following authorization server
metadata:
- `authorization_endpoint`
- `response_types_supported`
- `response_mode_supported`
To use this grant, homeservers and clients MUST:
- support the authorization code grant as per [RFC 6749 section 4.1](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-4.1)
- support the [refresh token grant](#refresh-token-grant)
- support PKCE using the `S256` code challenge method as per [RFC 7636](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7636)
- use pre-registered, strict redirect URIs
- use the `fragment` response mode as per [OAuth 2.0 Multiple Response Type
Encoding Practices](https://openid.net/specs/oauth-v2-multiple-response-types-1_0.html)
for clients with an HTTPS redirect URI
###### Login flow with the authorization code grant
Logging in with the OAuth 2.0 authorization code grant in the context of the
Matrix specification means to request a scope including full client-server API
read/write access and allocating a device ID.
First, the client needs to generate the following values:
- a random value for the `device_id`
- a random value for the `state`
- a cryptographically random value for the `code_verifier`
**Authorization request**
It then constructs the authorization request URL using the
`authorization_endpoint` value, with the following query parameters:
- The `response_type` value set to `code`
- The `client_id` value obtained by registering the client metadata with the
server
- The `redirect_uri` value that MUST match one of the values registered in the
client metadata
- The `scope` value set to `urn:matrix:client:api:* urn:matrix:client:device:<device_id>` with the `device_id` generated previously
- The `state` value
- The `response_mode` value
- The `code_challenge` computed from the `code_verifier` value using the SHA-256
algorithm, as described in [RFC 7636](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7636)
- The `code_challenge_method` set to `S256`
This authorization request URL must be opened in the user's browser:
- For web-based clients, this can be done through a redirection or by opening
the URL in a new tab
- For native clients, this can be done by opening the URL:
- using the system browser
- through platform-specific APIs when available, such as
[`ASWebAuthenticationSession`](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/authenticationservices/aswebauthenticationsession)
on iOS or [Android Custom Tabs](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/android/custom-tabs)
on Android
Sample authorization request, with extra whitespaces for readability:
```
https://account.example.com/oauth2/auth?
client_id = s6BhdRkqt3 &
response_type = code &
response_mode = fragment &
redirect_uri = https://app.example.com/oauth2-callback &
scope = urn:matrix:client:api:* urn:matrix:client:device:AAABBBCCCDDD &
state = ewubooN9weezeewah9fol4oothohroh3 &
code_challenge = 72xySjpngTcCxgbPfFmkPHjMvVDl2jW1aWP7-J6rmwU &
code_challenge_method = S256
```
**Callback**
Once completed, the user is redirected to the `redirect_uri`, with either a
successful or failed authorization in the URL fragment or query parameters.
Whether the parameters are in the URL fragment or query parameters is determined
by the `response_mode` value:
- if set to `fragment`, the parameters will be placed in the URL fragment, like
`https://example.com/callback#param1=value1&param2=value2`
- if set to `query`, the parameters will be in placed the query string, like
`com.example.app:/callback?param1=value1&param2=value2`
To avoid disclosing the parameters to the web server hosting the `redirect_uri`,
clients should use the `fragment` response mode if the `redirect_uri` is an
HTTPS URI with a remote host.
In both success and failure cases, the parameters will have the `state` value
used in the authorization request.
A successful authorization will have a `code` value, for example:
```
https://app.example.com/oauth2-callback#state=ewubooN9weezeewah9fol4oothohroh3&code=iuB7Eiz9heengah1joh2ioy9ahChuP6R
```
A failed authorization will have the following values:
- `error`: the error code
- `error_description`: the error description (optional)
- `error_uri`: the URI where the user can find more information about the error (optional)
For example:
```
https://app.example.com/oauth2-callback#state=ewubooN9weezeewah9fol4oothohroh3&error=access_denied&error_description=The+resource+owner+or+authorization+server+denied+the+request.&error_uri=https%3A%2F%2Ferrors.example.com%2F
```
**Token request**
The client then exchanges the authorization code to obtain an access token using
the token endpoint.
This is done by making a POST request to the `token_endpoint` with the following
parameters, encoded as `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` in the body:
- The `grant_type` set to `authorization_code`
- The `code` obtained from the callback
- The `redirect_uri` used in the authorization request
- The `client_id` value
- The `code_verifier` value generated at the start of the authorization flow
The server replies with a JSON object containing the access token, the token
type, the expiration time, and the refresh token.
Sample token request:
```
POST /oauth2/token HTTP/1.1
Host: account.example.com
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Accept: application/json
grant_type=authorization_code
&code=iuB7Eiz9heengah1joh2ioy9ahChuP6R
&redirect_uri=https://app.example.com/oauth2-callback
&client_id=s6BhdRkqt3
&code_verifier=ogie4iVaeteeKeeLaid0aizuimairaCh
```
Sample response:
```json
{
"access_token": "2YotnFZFEjr1zCsicMWpAA",
"token_type": "Bearer",
"expires_in": 299,
"refresh_token": "tGz3JOkF0XG5Qx2TlKWIA",
"scope": "urn:matrix:client:api:* urn:matrix:client:device:AAABBBCCCDDD"
}
```
Finally, the client can call the [`/whoami`](#get_matrixclientv3accountwhoami)
endpoint to get the user ID that owns the access token.
###### User registration
Clients can signal to the server that the user desires to register a new account
by initiating the authorization code grant with the `prompt=create` parameter
set in the authorization request as defined in [Initiating User Registration via
OpenID Connect 1.0](https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-prompt-create-1_0.html).
Whether the homeserver supports this parameter is advertised by the
`prompt_values_supported` authorization server metadata.
Servers that support this parameter SHOULD show the account registration UI in
the browser.
##### Refresh token grant
As per [RFC 6749 section 6](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-6),
the refresh token grant lets the client exchange a refresh token for an access
token.
When authorization is granted to a client, the homeserver MUST issue a refresh
token to the client in addition to the access token.
The access token MUST be short-lived and SHOULD be refreshed using the
`refresh_token` when expired.
The homeserver SHOULD issue a new refresh token each time one is used, and
invalidate the old one. It should do this only if it can guarantee that in case
a response with a new refresh token is not received and stored by the client,
retrying the request with the old refresh token will succeed.
The homeserver SHOULD consider that the session is compromised if an old,
invalidated refresh token is being used, and SHOULD revoke the session.
The client MUST handle access token refresh failures as follows:
- If the refresh fails due to network issues or a `5xx` HTTP status code from
the server, the client should retry the request with the old refresh token
later.
- If the refresh fails due to a `4xx` HTTP status code from the server, the
client should consider the session logged out.
###### Token refresh flow with the refresh token grant
When the access token expires, the client must refresh it by making a `POST`
request to the `token_endpoint` with the following parameters, encoded as
`application/x-www-form-urlencoded` in the body:
- The `grant_type` set to `refresh_token`
- The `refresh_token` obtained from the token response during the authorization
flow
- The `client_id` value obtained by registering the client metadata with the
server
The server replies with a JSON object containing the new access token, the token
type, the expiration time, and a new refresh token, like in the authorization
flow.
### Account moderation
#### Account locking