From f9cf99f1fd6c1b0cbdf77e86b6a4e532c13adb2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 15:31:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] typo

---
 proposals/1711-x509-for-federation.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/proposals/1711-x509-for-federation.md b/proposals/1711-x509-for-federation.md
index a31ae482..d30fe566 100644
--- a/proposals/1711-x509-for-federation.md
+++ b/proposals/1711-x509-for-federation.md
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ reasonable to relax the requirement for a signed certificate for such traffic.
 
 ## Conclusion
 
-We believe that requiring homservers to present an X.509 certificate signed by
+We believe that requiring homeservers to present an X.509 certificate signed by
 a recognised Certificate Authority will improve security, reduce
 centralisation, and eliminate some common deployment pitfalls.