Broken out of https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/pull/31727 as per
@dgozman's
[request](https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/pull/31727#discussion_r1685793229).
The PR goal is to remove the `suite` argument from the Component
testing's Vite Plugin. `suite` is used to enrich Vite's dependency graph
with information about dependencies between test suites and helper
files. It essentially merges the Vite graph with the
`compilationCache.ts > fileDependencies` graph, and then writes the
result back into `compilationCache.ts > externalDependencies`.
By refactoring this to make the connection on the reading end in
`collectAffectedTestFiles`, we can drop the `suite` parameter.
We didn't yet have a test that depended on the dependency graph being
connected correctly between `fileDependencies` and
`externalDepedencies`, so I've [extended an existing
test](53a539938b)
to capture that.
This reverts commit 0aa2f06f68.
Discussed the new permission in the API review and decided not to
proceed with the feature as we are not ready to commit to supporting it
yet:
* the API is Chromium specific
* the API is still experimental
* there is no clarity to what extend the screen manipulation APIs will
work in old headless which is our main test environment
We'll keep an eye on the demand for the feature and may get back to
implementing it in the future.
Reference: https://github.com/microsoft/playwright/issues/27198
Fixes misspellings identified by the [check-spelling
action](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/check-spelling).
The misspellings have been reported at
https://github.com/jsoref/playwright/actions/runs/10015023629#summary-27685777352
The action will report that the changes in this PR would make it happy:
https://github.com/jsoref/playwright/actions/runs/10015023971#summary-27685778305
---
I understand that the commit messages will need to be reworded to match
house style. For the time being, these are merely noting the changes
they contain so that when I rebase or need to drop things, I can. --
I've already rebased once as someone fixed one of the items that my
draft work was going to fix.
---
## Testing
* The tests _mostly_ passed when I managed to trigger them, but there
were a handful of things that I didn't quite understand
* There are a large number of warnings relating to a bad interaction
between any workflow that uses this local action
b535139b32/.github/actions/run-test/action.yml (L74-L80)
and the action it calls -- I've opened Azure/login#474 asking them to
refactor their action so that it doesn't cause so much noise while
running this repository's tests
* I'm vaguely curious as to why this repository has a `branch`
constraint for its `pull_request` events in its workflows -- that
constraint gave me a number of additional headaches while trying to
prepare this branch for this PR.
---------
Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com>
